PHASES OF OPERATIONS.
Three phases of operation are recognized: mitigation, warning and response.
These are generally described in the succeeding paras.
Mitigation
Mitigation involves risk reduction and monitoring to lessen socioeconomic impact of a disaster. Earthquake disaster mitigation entails protecting the public against the possible impact of future earthquake events.
There is consequently a requirement for a variety of spatial and temporal
information from different sources: demographics, building stock characterization, seismic history and neo-tectonic understanding, the location of faults and an understanding of their mechanism dynamics, including fault
motion and strain.
Warning
Warning involves forecasting and cautionary processes and systems.
For earthquakes, this implies predicting an event to within 15 km,
a few days, and one order of magnitude - a current impossibility.
Yet some progress to that end has been made. In addition to seismic
techniques, earthquake prediction technologies include such approaches
as coupling of ground-motion measurement devices, high tech computing
and electronic switches and valves. There has been a dramatic increase
in the resolution and amount of data available from weather satellites,
besides vital improvement in their interpretation. These two factors
have lead to more accurate and timely forecasts of some natural disasters
such as earthquakes
The world over use of space-based sensors and military reconnaissance
aircraft have been of a great help in the assessment of major disasters,
such as wildfires, pollution, drought, and flooding. The application
of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology to disaster planning
and management is significant. By integrating GIS with Global Positioning
System (GPS) data, it is now possible to accurately predict potential
flood levels anywhere in the world. Experts can use the output from
laser beams across fault lines, hydro dams, bridges, etc., when coupled
with GIS/GPS feedback, to detect earth movement, structural failure,
or landmark displacement.
Response
Response involves search and rescue operations, restoration of communications
and civic amenities, crisis management and damage control for which
information becomes vital. Disaster management is like a military
operation and is best left to the armed forces to conduct in the way
they are trained to do so. A simultaneous activity is mapping damage
extent and nature, primarily for purposes of relief. The information
required in the first hours after an event is not necessarily the
same as that required days or weeks afterwards.
Relief and Rehabilitation
If one were to analyze the physical damage, its intensity would pale
in the face of psychological suffering, trauma and anxiety. Its sole
panacea and alleviation is information and human communicative interaction,
in other words "reaching out to the victims." The technologies for
relief and rehabilitation require efficient technologies for search,
rescue, post-disaster relief, communication and information dissemination
arrangement.
In September 1993, an earthquake struck Maharashtra, killing about
8,000 people and damaging some 230,000 houses in Latur, Osmanabad,
and eleven other districts. With the help of the World Bank, the government
of Maharashtra did a commendable job in rehabilitating the affected.
A programme called Maharashtra Emergency Earthquake Rehabilitation
Programme (MEERP) was initiated which institutionalized community
participation and ensured that beneficiaries were formally consulted
at all stages of implementation. The government of Maharashtra took
an innovative step and appointed two respected community organizations,
the Tata Institute of Social Sciences and the Society for Promotion
of Resource Area Centre to carry out the reconstruction process. That
lent the programme legitimacy and credibility. Its significance lay
in beneficiaries being involved in decision making at all critical
stages and provision of technical assistance to ensure that the houses
were earthquake resistant. Training programmes were also organized
in the villages. Within a year and a half, the programme took on the
dimensions of a housing movement, As the MEERP progressed and results
materialized, community participation in the rehabilitation received
greater acceptance. While project management unit officials were initially
skeptical of the community participation process, they later came
to recognize it as an effective tool for dealing with difficulties
that arose during implementation. Participation also had a positive
psychological effect. The MEERP became a people's project, opening
many informal channels of communications and accessibility between
the people and the government. Lessons that stand out are a sense
of participation, mutual consultation, information and awareness,
areas where the IETE has ventured into through its mass computer literacy
programme.